About This Site

We believe the historical record should be preserved — not because we want to sell you something, but because the truth matters. This site exists to document what happened to Royal Raymond Rife and let you draw your own conclusions.

Mission

This site exists to preserve and present the documented history of Royal Raymond Rife and his research. We believe this story deserves to be told accurately, with respect for both the evidence and the reader.

We are not advocates selling a product. We are not debunkers dismissing a legacy. We present what the historical record shows — documented facts, primary sources, and honest acknowledgment of what remains unverified.

Our Approach

We Lead with Evidence

Every claim on this site is sourced. When we cite the Smithsonian Institution Annual Report, you can verify it. When we reference the Fitzgerald Report, it's in the Congressional Record. Court transcripts, newspaper archives, patent records — primary sources whenever possible.

We Distinguish Fact from Claim

There is a difference between "the Smithsonian published specifications of Rife's microscope" (documented fact) and "Rife cured 16 terminal cancer patients" (historical claim without surviving clinical documentation). We make this distinction explicit.

We Acknowledge Limitations

Critical records have disappeared. The 1934 clinical trial documentation is lost. The USC committee records are gone. We don't pretend to have proof we don't have. We present what exists and note what's missing.

We Include Critical Perspectives

We reference the Quekett Journal analysis that found the surviving microscope's resolution "extremely poor." We note that mainstream science does not accept Rife's specific claims. Intellectual honesty requires engaging with counterarguments, not ignoring them.

We Don't Make Medical Claims

This site presents historical and educational information. It is not medical advice. We don't tell you that frequency therapy will cure disease. We tell you what Rife claimed, what the historical record shows, and what modern research has validated.

Why This Matters

In 2015, the FDA approved Tumor Treating Fields — a therapy using specific electromagnetic frequencies to treat glioblastoma. Median survival increased from 16 months to 21 months. The principle that electromagnetic frequencies can selectively affect cancer cells is no longer theoretical.

Royal Raymond Rife investigated this principle in the 1930s. Whether his specific claims were valid or not, the core concept he explored is now saving lives — 90 years later, without his name attached.

This site exists because the historical record should be preserved. Because documented suppression of medical research is worth understanding. Because the pattern of how institutions respond to disruptive innovation deserves examination. And because the truth, whatever it is, deserves to be sought honestly.

Legal Disclaimer

Important Notice

This website provides historical and educational information only. It is not intended as medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendation.

  • Frequency devices are not FDA-approved for the treatment of any disease in the United States.
  • Do not use this information in place of consultation with qualified healthcare providers.
  • The frequency lists and protocols presented here are historical references and research starting points, not validated treatment protocols.
  • Individual results with any therapy vary. Historical claims should not be interpreted as guaranteed outcomes.

If you have a medical condition, consult a licensed healthcare provider. Nothing on this site should be construed as an attempt to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Independence

This site does not sell devices, treatments, supplements, or services. We have no financial relationship with any device manufacturer, practitioner, or commercial entity in the frequency therapy space. Our only interest is accurate historical documentation.

Corrections and Contributions

If you have access to primary source material not documented here — original photographs, documents, correspondence, or other historical evidence — we would be interested to know. If you identify factual errors in our presentation, we will correct them.

The historical record should be as complete and accurate as possible.